But whose economy would that be then?
Relatives sending money back home to benefit from new money transfer charterAfrican and Asian Diaspora communities who support relatives by sending money back home will benefit from a new charter for money transfer companies announced yesterday by International Development Minister Shahid Malik.
People in the UK send an estimated £2.3 billion a year to loved ones in over 50 developing countries – a key source of overseas funds for many economies. Yet many find the process difficult and insecure. Charges vary widely and the total cost to send £100 to some countries can range from less than £4 to as much as £40.
Black and Asian communities in the UK send around £2.3 billion a year to relatives in more than 50 developing countries. Africans are the most likely to send money back home, whilst Asians send the largest amounts. The biggest recipient countries of money transfers are India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Jamaica and Ghana.
Continued:http://www.blackbritain.co.uk/news/details.aspx?i=2630&c=uk
Polish immigrants take £1bn out of the UK economy
Polish immigrants sent home almost £1billion in the first three months of this year, it has been revealed The cash taken out of the UK economy would otherwise have been spent in shops, restaurants and other businesses here. The figures, compiled by the National Bank of Poland, showed that £1.1 billion was sent back from Western Europe to family members living in the former Eastern Bloc country since January.
Continued:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/artiage_id=1&in_page_id=1&expand=true
Having such a large amount of currency leaving the country on a daily basis is seriously weakening the Pound. If it wasn't for the fact that the Dollar is even weaker, the papers would be screaming about economic doom and gloom. For instance today the pound is at its weakest against the Euro than it ever has been. The signs are not good for a recovery either and until we can stop this outflow of cash the future looks bleak.
We can do this the hard way, or the easy way. As it happens, it’s the easier option which has the best chance of yielding the desired result; this means stopping immigration now, and applying full and urgent attention to the training and education that the indigenous young so clearly need, if we’re not going to be changed forever into a society which relies on foreigners to fix everything from the cistern to the flippin’ football ‘team’. This training and education, in the case of unemploymed youngsters, should not be an option, it must be compulsory. Hordes of aimless NEETS are not exactly a recipe for a healthy present or future for any of us. As for the ‘hard way’, I won’t bleat on any more about that here, as I think most of us understand what it means.
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Wednesday, January 09, 2008
No Go Areas - It's The BNP's Fault Again
I was listening to Jeremy Vine on Radio 2 yesterday (7/1/08) discussing what the Bishop of Rochester had to say about no-go areas for non Muslims in the Sunday Telegraph over the weekend.
One guest was The Independent columnist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, the other being the Bishop of Burnley, the Rt. Revd John Goddard. Now you might think a discussion instigated by the BBC featuring a Muslim and a clergyman from Burnley of all places might just lead somewhere else other than the matter in hand. We weren’t to be disappointed
Miss Alibhai-Brown after telling listeners that the Bishop of Rochester was of course ‘talking dangerous nonsense’ and was obviously jealous because he was overlooked for the Canterbury and York jobs, then turned her attention to Burnley. Apparentley she was up in Burnley about three months ago. While there, she told listeners, she was abused by white people. She was SWORN at, SPAT at, and wait for it, STONED as well. I thought that Muslims weren’t allowed to drink alcohol or get of their face doing drugs, she must have been on something surely?
At this point an incredulous Vine interjected. You were SWORN at, SPAT at, and STONED. Did you write about this in your newspaper column? Her sheepish reply went along the line, “er no, I didn’t want people to think it was all the white community.”
So she didn’t write about this ‘incident’ in her column and I think we can take it she didn’t report it to the police either. Now I wouldn’t accuse the lady of lying through her teeth, but possibly she’s being a little economical with the truth.
It was then the turn of the Bishop of Burnley. His opening line was to apologise to Ms Brown for her ‘horrible experience’ and tell of the problems he has with the ‘far right fascist BNP.’ No definition or instances of BNP ‘fascism’ of course, but then again demonisation seems to be their only weapon nowadays.
So we have the Bishop of Rochester pilloried for telling the truth as he sees it about some Muslim areas, and the BNP being slaughtered on the high altar of multiculturalism by the ever increasingly irrelevant C of E.
Alibaba Brown
Unfortunately, Ms Brown pops up on The Wright Stuff as well now and then and appears to have nothing nice to say about anybody. She usually moans about how many racists there are, how racist an experience she had last week, whilst coming across as a total racist herself. The trouble with people like that is that they need to have something to moan about to exist otherwise they have nothing going for them at all. “Is it because I is black?” … NO! - it’s because you are a nasty natured whinger without the virtue to see good in anything or the grace to say so. You are also a two faced liar Ms Brown (there I said it).
P.S. If you're still doubtful that these no go areas exist, here is a little report from the Burnley Citizen from last October.
One guest was The Independent columnist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, the other being the Bishop of Burnley, the Rt. Revd John Goddard. Now you might think a discussion instigated by the BBC featuring a Muslim and a clergyman from Burnley of all places might just lead somewhere else other than the matter in hand. We weren’t to be disappointed
Miss Alibhai-Brown after telling listeners that the Bishop of Rochester was of course ‘talking dangerous nonsense’ and was obviously jealous because he was overlooked for the Canterbury and York jobs, then turned her attention to Burnley. Apparentley she was up in Burnley about three months ago. While there, she told listeners, she was abused by white people. She was SWORN at, SPAT at, and wait for it, STONED as well. I thought that Muslims weren’t allowed to drink alcohol or get of their face doing drugs, she must have been on something surely?
At this point an incredulous Vine interjected. You were SWORN at, SPAT at, and STONED. Did you write about this in your newspaper column? Her sheepish reply went along the line, “er no, I didn’t want people to think it was all the white community.”
So she didn’t write about this ‘incident’ in her column and I think we can take it she didn’t report it to the police either. Now I wouldn’t accuse the lady of lying through her teeth, but possibly she’s being a little economical with the truth.
It was then the turn of the Bishop of Burnley. His opening line was to apologise to Ms Brown for her ‘horrible experience’ and tell of the problems he has with the ‘far right fascist BNP.’ No definition or instances of BNP ‘fascism’ of course, but then again demonisation seems to be their only weapon nowadays.
So we have the Bishop of Rochester pilloried for telling the truth as he sees it about some Muslim areas, and the BNP being slaughtered on the high altar of multiculturalism by the ever increasingly irrelevant C of E.
Alibaba Brown
Unfortunately, Ms Brown pops up on The Wright Stuff as well now and then and appears to have nothing nice to say about anybody. She usually moans about how many racists there are, how racist an experience she had last week, whilst coming across as a total racist herself. The trouble with people like that is that they need to have something to moan about to exist otherwise they have nothing going for them at all. “Is it because I is black?” … NO! - it’s because you are a nasty natured whinger without the virtue to see good in anything or the grace to say so. You are also a two faced liar Ms Brown (there I said it).
P.S. If you're still doubtful that these no go areas exist, here is a little report from the Burnley Citizen from last October.
A TEENAGER was attacked by a group of Asian youths in Manchester Road, Burnley.
Police have appealed for witnesses to the attack on the 15-year-old male, which took place at 11pm on October 19. Police said a group of Asian males got out of their cars and said get off our streets' and attacked the teenager with their hands.
Sunday, January 06, 2008
Britain's No Whites Areas Thanks to Islamofascism
Islamic extremism in Britain is creating communities which are "no-go areas" for non-Muslims, a senior Church of England bishop warns today. The Bishop of Rochester, The Rt Rev Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, says non-Muslims face a hostile reception in places dominated by the ideology of Islamic radicals. He criticises the doctrine of multi-culturalism for creating separate communities which fail to integrate into the mainstream of society.
Read the rest from The Mail
If you're a member of any nationalist organisation or indeed a victim of this example of multiculturalism you will know we have been round this particular subject on a number of occasions and there is no simple solution now, and for the future, because the damage is already done for the fundamental reason that such ghettos, based on ethnicity, religious belief and even skin colour have already been created in every major town and city in this country. There were very clear examples of this happening, along the chain of former mill towns in Lancashire and the former wool towns in Yorkshire, and the growth of single ethnicity boroughs in the capital city, more than two decades ago when rioting and apparent ‘no-go’ areas were established in places like Oldham, Rochdale, Burnley, Bradford and Halifax, and it is unlikely to change.
Complacency and procrastination are the mothers of decline. The problem lies entirely with the notion of multiculturalism which, basically, encouraged the various ethnic minorities coming here to continue to apply and adhere to their own cultures, creeds, customs and traditions but did not impress upon them from the start the need for them to integrate, by adapting and adopting, into our society and not the other way around. It is one thing to be tolerant but when ethnic minorities begin to dictate policy and direction then that is when politicians should have had the nous and the balls to unequivocally state that there is only one law in this country and that is the law of the land; that the rules, regulations and guidelines in existence in this nation are the ones that must be applied regardless of race or religion; that some of the traditions applied in their country of origin might not be acceptable here; and, that whilst we are tolerant no form of extremism will be contemplated in communities and within schools.
Unfettered immigration has also allowed many to come here who not only have no religious, moral, social or ethical connection to the indigenous population of this small island, but who, in some cases are totally intolerant of other religions and religious beliefs and who even seek to impress upon their neighbours their brand of religion to the exclusion of all others. Our ultra-tolerant approach and acceptance of others, based on woolly liberal elite thinking and attitudes, has created a confused mass of people many of whom are no longer certain of their background, their culture and their creeds. There is no such nationality as British because it embraces a multitude of sins and the indigenous people of this country should have been allowed to continue to call themselves English, Scottish or Welsh, according to their own choice. Added to which, possibly based on the kind of leadership and direction provided by politicians, senior businessmen and women and a liberal elite media, many people in the United Kingdom have, over the last few decades, lost all notion of social, moral and ethical values and have gradually turned away from the Christian beliefs and principles that formed the baseline of this Christian nation for centuries. It may be because the C of E, for a start, lost all sense of direction and no longer applied the fundamental teachings in the Bible, and other Christian literature, by adopting a too liberal approach to its religion; and, because of one or two areas of belief the Catholic church lost some of its congregation because it too lost a clear message and direction.
Some politicians have openly discouraged the notion of religious faith-based schools because, they imply, it does nothing more than increase intolerance and separation. But their foreign policies and their failure to support the indigenous population, the English, the Scots and the Welsh, against other nationalities who come here has also undermined the notion of nationhood, have not supported the place of the Christian religion in our society further weakening the strength of the Christian faith.
As I've said, there are no easy solutions to this increasingly dangerous polarisation of creeds, but a start would be to vote for a party that would put British law, traditions, history, free speech first and to do that would mean NOT voting for the globalist parties of Nu Labour, Tory and Lib Dim. Of course if you are satisfied with the current situation and would like to see "no whites" signs in your towns and cities then continue to cast your vote for the big three. Me? mine will be with any nationalist party specifically at the moment The BNP, until Britons get Britain back, over to you.
Read the rest from The Mail
If you're a member of any nationalist organisation or indeed a victim of this example of multiculturalism you will know we have been round this particular subject on a number of occasions and there is no simple solution now, and for the future, because the damage is already done for the fundamental reason that such ghettos, based on ethnicity, religious belief and even skin colour have already been created in every major town and city in this country. There were very clear examples of this happening, along the chain of former mill towns in Lancashire and the former wool towns in Yorkshire, and the growth of single ethnicity boroughs in the capital city, more than two decades ago when rioting and apparent ‘no-go’ areas were established in places like Oldham, Rochdale, Burnley, Bradford and Halifax, and it is unlikely to change.
Complacency and procrastination are the mothers of decline. The problem lies entirely with the notion of multiculturalism which, basically, encouraged the various ethnic minorities coming here to continue to apply and adhere to their own cultures, creeds, customs and traditions but did not impress upon them from the start the need for them to integrate, by adapting and adopting, into our society and not the other way around. It is one thing to be tolerant but when ethnic minorities begin to dictate policy and direction then that is when politicians should have had the nous and the balls to unequivocally state that there is only one law in this country and that is the law of the land; that the rules, regulations and guidelines in existence in this nation are the ones that must be applied regardless of race or religion; that some of the traditions applied in their country of origin might not be acceptable here; and, that whilst we are tolerant no form of extremism will be contemplated in communities and within schools.
Unfettered immigration has also allowed many to come here who not only have no religious, moral, social or ethical connection to the indigenous population of this small island, but who, in some cases are totally intolerant of other religions and religious beliefs and who even seek to impress upon their neighbours their brand of religion to the exclusion of all others. Our ultra-tolerant approach and acceptance of others, based on woolly liberal elite thinking and attitudes, has created a confused mass of people many of whom are no longer certain of their background, their culture and their creeds. There is no such nationality as British because it embraces a multitude of sins and the indigenous people of this country should have been allowed to continue to call themselves English, Scottish or Welsh, according to their own choice. Added to which, possibly based on the kind of leadership and direction provided by politicians, senior businessmen and women and a liberal elite media, many people in the United Kingdom have, over the last few decades, lost all notion of social, moral and ethical values and have gradually turned away from the Christian beliefs and principles that formed the baseline of this Christian nation for centuries. It may be because the C of E, for a start, lost all sense of direction and no longer applied the fundamental teachings in the Bible, and other Christian literature, by adopting a too liberal approach to its religion; and, because of one or two areas of belief the Catholic church lost some of its congregation because it too lost a clear message and direction.
Some politicians have openly discouraged the notion of religious faith-based schools because, they imply, it does nothing more than increase intolerance and separation. But their foreign policies and their failure to support the indigenous population, the English, the Scots and the Welsh, against other nationalities who come here has also undermined the notion of nationhood, have not supported the place of the Christian religion in our society further weakening the strength of the Christian faith.
As I've said, there are no easy solutions to this increasingly dangerous polarisation of creeds, but a start would be to vote for a party that would put British law, traditions, history, free speech first and to do that would mean NOT voting for the globalist parties of Nu Labour, Tory and Lib Dim. Of course if you are satisfied with the current situation and would like to see "no whites" signs in your towns and cities then continue to cast your vote for the big three. Me? mine will be with any nationalist party specifically at the moment The BNP, until Britons get Britain back, over to you.
Saturday, January 05, 2008
Charlene Downes Trial Update - It's Now April
From The Blackpool Gazette
THE trial of two men accused of being behind the disappearance of Blackpool teenager Charlene Downes has been put back until April.Charlene vanished in November 2003 after waving goodbye to her mother at a town centre bus stop. She was then aged 14.
Iyad Albattikhi, 30, the former owner of Funny Boyz kebab shop on Dickson Road, Blackpool, is charged with murdering Charlene.His business partner Mohammed Reveshi, 51, of Hornby Road, is accused of helping dispose of the St George’s High School pupil’s body. Both deny the charges.
At a trial held last year the jury could not reach a verdict on either man. A retrial was expected to begin on January 21. But that has now been set back to April 2 to allow Albattikhi’s defence team more time to prepare.Det Sgt Jan Beasant of Blackpool Police said: “The trial has been delayed to allow the defence to do more preparation with their witnesses. The family have been notified and are aware of the new trial date.”
A spokeswoman for the Crown Prosecution Service said: “The date has changed because Mr Albattikhi has secured a new legal team who wanted more time to go through all the evidence.”
14-year-old Charlene Downes (if you remember) is believed by Blackpool police to have been raped, strangled and her body cut up and turned into kebabs and tile grout after her disappearance in November 2003. Two Muslim men - one a former social worker - were unsuccessfuly tried last July for her murder or with assisting in the disposal of her body. The combination of this murder, the appalling likelihood that scores of unwitting customers actually ate Charlene, and the unasked question as to whether this was another case involving the grooming for sex and drugs of a young white girl by a Muslim sex predator gang should have made this killing national front page news but in fact rarely achieved anything more than a few lines on the BBC website in the regional news section.
The Blackpool Gazette does however have a large number of news items about the case and if you haven't read through them I would suggest you find sometime and gen up about this horrific crime.
Here are all the links
Court told of "criminal sexual activity"
Kill stories are "fiction" jury is told
Murder trial: 'I am not lying about Charlene'
Charlene received chilling letter
Mum weeps over daughter's gruesome death
Charlene trial: "Why did you kill her?"
"Blood on the walls" Charlene murder trial told
Police tell Charlene trial: "It was no set-up"
Charlene jury told how accused 'confessed'
Charlene accused 'felt bit like serial killer'
Charlene suspect 'sobbed in car' claim police
'Life torn apart' by Charlene claims
Takeaway boss tells murder jury: "The real killer's still out there"
"Is it a crime to cry?" asks Charlene accused
Murder-claim tapes unreliable – expert
Murder trial told of 'sexual advances'
Schoolgirl's body 'ended up in kebabs'
What has happened to missing Charlene?
New move in teenager hunt
Hoping Charlene is home for Christmas
Nationwide bid to track missing teen
BBC show highlights teen's disappearance
Mum tells of farewell to missing Charlene
Police chief's worst fears over Charlene
Charlene: extra police called in
'Nightmare' goes on for girl's family
'We still pray that Charlene will come home'
Search for Charlenes body
'Evil' takeaway shut down
Missing girl: men hunted
THE trial of two men accused of being behind the disappearance of Blackpool teenager Charlene Downes has been put back until April.Charlene vanished in November 2003 after waving goodbye to her mother at a town centre bus stop. She was then aged 14.
Iyad Albattikhi, 30, the former owner of Funny Boyz kebab shop on Dickson Road, Blackpool, is charged with murdering Charlene.His business partner Mohammed Reveshi, 51, of Hornby Road, is accused of helping dispose of the St George’s High School pupil’s body. Both deny the charges.
At a trial held last year the jury could not reach a verdict on either man. A retrial was expected to begin on January 21. But that has now been set back to April 2 to allow Albattikhi’s defence team more time to prepare.Det Sgt Jan Beasant of Blackpool Police said: “The trial has been delayed to allow the defence to do more preparation with their witnesses. The family have been notified and are aware of the new trial date.”
A spokeswoman for the Crown Prosecution Service said: “The date has changed because Mr Albattikhi has secured a new legal team who wanted more time to go through all the evidence.”
14-year-old Charlene Downes (if you remember) is believed by Blackpool police to have been raped, strangled and her body cut up and turned into kebabs and tile grout after her disappearance in November 2003. Two Muslim men - one a former social worker - were unsuccessfuly tried last July for her murder or with assisting in the disposal of her body. The combination of this murder, the appalling likelihood that scores of unwitting customers actually ate Charlene, and the unasked question as to whether this was another case involving the grooming for sex and drugs of a young white girl by a Muslim sex predator gang should have made this killing national front page news but in fact rarely achieved anything more than a few lines on the BBC website in the regional news section.
The Blackpool Gazette does however have a large number of news items about the case and if you haven't read through them I would suggest you find sometime and gen up about this horrific crime.
Here are all the links
Court told of "criminal sexual activity"
Kill stories are "fiction" jury is told
Murder trial: 'I am not lying about Charlene'
Charlene received chilling letter
Mum weeps over daughter's gruesome death
Charlene trial: "Why did you kill her?"
"Blood on the walls" Charlene murder trial told
Police tell Charlene trial: "It was no set-up"
Charlene jury told how accused 'confessed'
Charlene accused 'felt bit like serial killer'
Charlene suspect 'sobbed in car' claim police
'Life torn apart' by Charlene claims
Takeaway boss tells murder jury: "The real killer's still out there"
"Is it a crime to cry?" asks Charlene accused
Murder-claim tapes unreliable – expert
Murder trial told of 'sexual advances'
Schoolgirl's body 'ended up in kebabs'
What has happened to missing Charlene?
New move in teenager hunt
Hoping Charlene is home for Christmas
Nationwide bid to track missing teen
BBC show highlights teen's disappearance
Mum tells of farewell to missing Charlene
Police chief's worst fears over Charlene
Charlene: extra police called in
'Nightmare' goes on for girl's family
'We still pray that Charlene will come home'
Search for Charlenes body
'Evil' takeaway shut down
Missing girl: men hunted
Friday, January 04, 2008
British Blogger to be Arrested - Democracy Commie Style
This is disturbing. According to the blogger Lionheart an arrest warrant has been issued and he will be taken in for questioning as soon as he returns to Britain under hate speech laws. Yet all he has done is try to warn his many readers, like so many of us bloggers do of the impending dangers of creeping radical islamification of Britain and other European countries.
This is a fight again for Freedom of Speech and we all must unite and take on the destroyers of Britain and win. Go and read his story here and don't forget to leave a message of support and then blog about on your own site so as many people as possible can learn about this injustice. Pass it on
Hopefully they will also arrest the hundreds of 'British' ragheads who write and do far worse aswell.
But I doubt it
This is a fight again for Freedom of Speech and we all must unite and take on the destroyers of Britain and win. Go and read his story here and don't forget to leave a message of support and then blog about on your own site so as many people as possible can learn about this injustice. Pass it on
Hopefully they will also arrest the hundreds of 'British' ragheads who write and do far worse aswell.
But I doubt it
Thursday, January 03, 2008
The Bomb, The Bullet, The Bayonet - Democracy of the 21st Century
"I have lived in Kenya for 14 years and everyone knows it's about the ethnic divisions.
As Pakistanis blow each other to smithereens in their political process and Kenyans merrily machete each other in theirs, isn't it just dandy to think that both sides in both countries will be using this as the perfect excuse to enter our country and infect our political process still further. But still the melting pot merchants mince on about how desirable it is for people of different races and creeds to come together in a John Lennon-style love in. So we can look forward to the next election with events like those told to a T.V. reporter about how a woman ran screeming from a burning church with her child in her arms only to be confronted by a man from another tribe who promptly grabbed her child and threw it back into the burning building. Or perhaps the leader of the opposition being blown apart by some muslim radical for insulting Mo by err I dont know, looking at the image of the prophet in a funny way.
Yet liberals seem to think that when you scoop up 50,000 of these very individuals - and plant them in......Surrey.......or wherever, they will become Uber humans with enriching qualities that are 'vibrant' and give us all lawyers and doctors.......Its like pouring red paint into a tin of white and not expecting it to go pink. It just doesnt happen. It hasn't even happened in Kenya pre or post colonialism and they're all the same colour!
As Pakistanis blow each other to smithereens in their political process and Kenyans merrily machete each other in theirs, isn't it just dandy to think that both sides in both countries will be using this as the perfect excuse to enter our country and infect our political process still further. But still the melting pot merchants mince on about how desirable it is for people of different races and creeds to come together in a John Lennon-style love in. So we can look forward to the next election with events like those told to a T.V. reporter about how a woman ran screeming from a burning church with her child in her arms only to be confronted by a man from another tribe who promptly grabbed her child and threw it back into the burning building. Or perhaps the leader of the opposition being blown apart by some muslim radical for insulting Mo by err I dont know, looking at the image of the prophet in a funny way.
Yet liberals seem to think that when you scoop up 50,000 of these very individuals - and plant them in......Surrey.......or wherever, they will become Uber humans with enriching qualities that are 'vibrant' and give us all lawyers and doctors.......Its like pouring red paint into a tin of white and not expecting it to go pink. It just doesnt happen. It hasn't even happened in Kenya pre or post colonialism and they're all the same colour!
The chaos in Kenya however, over the last few days does make one despair of our civilisation's future. Since 1945 the western concept of democracy has been imposed upon a wide variety of nations and cultures, with, it has to be said, some varying degrees of success, but with some really spectacular failures as well. Africa is but one example of the failures. The Far East has several more examples and the debacle that is the Middle East provides some really educational views on the manner in which the concept of one man, one vote can go badly wrong.
So why is this the case? Surely anyone of sense can see the benefit of living in a state where the government is of the people and by the people? That after all, is the stated intention of democracy.
The truth is that it has never actually worked as advertised. Not even in the "Mother of Parliaments", Westminster. At its best there is a balance struck between the interests of the tax payer (Who, after all is said and done, pays for it all!), the interests of the commercial giants who buy and sell even our supposedly "honest" politicians, the financial investors who are increasingly loyal to no known state, the "collective" of Trades Unions and of course, the "special" interest groups like Greenpeace, Amnesty and the plethora of ethnic minority organisations who highjack debates and the media attention to promote their often unbalanced views. Parliament broadly represents a wide range of interests, which just occasionally used to actually benefit the tax paying voter by and large. I am not sure that state exists any longer. Increasingly the only beneficiaries of much of what flows from that house of cards is of benefit only to limited groups such as lawyers, civil servants and other narrow interest groups. In other words it no longer represents government of the people for the people, but for the limited interests of the entrenched political and bureaucratic classes and their bankers.
So perhaps next time there is an election we should learn from our cousins in Asia and Africa and consider whether the bomb, the bullet and the bayonet might be usefuls tools to be used, not against our fellow citizens of course but against the necks of our true enemies, the politicians, so that the increasingly aggrieved publics voice is actually heard and listened to next time. Certainly though if mass immigration continues unabated the choice may soon be taken out of our own hands and the consequences do not bear thinking about if indeed that does happen.
Wednesday, January 02, 2008
Racist Organisation Collapses Midst Claims of Spying
Just seen on the news here. The housing association Ujima has closed. Probably a bad thing, I don't know. To be perfectly honest, I wasn't even aware that the housing association Ujima existed until about ten minutes ago. But, see, and here's the thing: Ujima was a black only housing association. Ujima was a housing association that would only house black people.
This is active racial discrimination of the most repulsive order? Well in our twisted country apparently not.
So let's say, for instance, that I started up my own housing association, and let's say, for instance, that I made it a point of policy that my housing association was only going to house white people. That'd be wrong. Wouldn't it?
And yet, it would appear that Ujima could do exactly that. With blessing. And if it wasn't for this kind of bias well the BNP might just be a trivial non-entity but of course this kind of anti-white anti British attitude is rife amongst the political classes of today who won't be happy until they have destroyed Britain and her indigenous population of Scottish, English, Welsh and Irish citizens.
But of course that's not all, as is typical of many organisations created by Nu Labour to help minorities it is filled with sleaze, ineptitude, hints of fraud, mismanagement, nepotism and general crapiness.
Doing a search on Ujima I came across a post from a blogger called Newmania who has highlighted a sleazy affair between the Ujima Housing Association and MP for Islington South & Finsbury Emily Thornberry.
On the 1st November 2007 when it was becoming clear that Ujima was failing it's business was investigated by the governing body of the industry to ascertain the problems which in turn led to Ujima head Keith Kerr claiming that the company was being spied upon.
Board Members
Anthony Aseme
Marta Phillips
Yvette Mayers
Leadership Team
Keith Kerr
Cedric Boston
Tony Buckley
Tony Brown
Previn Tailor
Nadine Ofori Atta
Abena Nsia
This is active racial discrimination of the most repulsive order? Well in our twisted country apparently not.
So let's say, for instance, that I started up my own housing association, and let's say, for instance, that I made it a point of policy that my housing association was only going to house white people. That'd be wrong. Wouldn't it?
And yet, it would appear that Ujima could do exactly that. With blessing. And if it wasn't for this kind of bias well the BNP might just be a trivial non-entity but of course this kind of anti-white anti British attitude is rife amongst the political classes of today who won't be happy until they have destroyed Britain and her indigenous population of Scottish, English, Welsh and Irish citizens.
But of course that's not all, as is typical of many organisations created by Nu Labour to help minorities it is filled with sleaze, ineptitude, hints of fraud, mismanagement, nepotism and general crapiness.
Doing a search on Ujima I came across a post from a blogger called Newmania who has highlighted a sleazy affair between the Ujima Housing Association and MP for Islington South & Finsbury Emily Thornberry.
A member of a government scrutiny committee has sparked controversy after buying a home from a housing association for her parliamentary aides to live in. The MP for Islington South & Finsbury Emily Thornberry and her family bought the property from Ujima Housing Group for £572,000. Ms Thornberry sits on the Communities and Local Government select committee. The property is one of several in the street which was sold against the will of the housing association's tenants. They claimed they contacted Ms Thornberry for support last year as they felt they were being turned out of their homes. The MP's office denied there had been any involvement with the tenants before the house was bought. The name of Ms Thornberry's husband, deputy high court judge Christopher Nugee QC, is on the deeds of the house. Ms Thornberry's office said she had bought the property for young people 'she knows' in their early 20s . Ms Thornberry - who has championed social tenants' rights - issued a statement saying: 'We bought this property in the spring at auction. This is not about property speculation - we are providing cheap and cheerful accommodation for some young people.' Ms Thornberry - who would have seen that the property belonged to a housing association at the auction - asked for a meeting with housing minister Yvette Cooper last year to complain that Islington council was 'giving in to developers' and building luxury flats instead of affordable housing (Inside Housing, 27 October 2006). Ujima Housing Group was unavailable for comment.Spying
On the 1st November 2007 when it was becoming clear that Ujima was failing it's business was investigated by the governing body of the industry to ascertain the problems which in turn led to Ujima head Keith Kerr claiming that the company was being spied upon.
Ujima Housing Association has launched an extraordinary attack on the Housing Corporation's decision to place it under supervision. The three housing professionals the corporation has appointed to the association's board have been labelled 'spies' by Ujima's chief executive Keith Kerr. The reasons for the regulator's action against his association were 'concocted' in a fit of 'panic', he told Inside Housing. Mr Kerr described placing his association under supervision as an 'unjustifiable attack on the best-governed, best-led, best-managed housing association in the sector'.The best led, best managed housing association in the sector obviously has some easy to beat standard as the report continues
A letter sent to Ujima by the corporation on Tuesday said the regulator was concerned by the findings of an employment tribunal in which the association'sAnd finally, what do the black tenants of Ujima think, well of to comment is free for the answer to that.
former development director, Kye Gbangbola, won his claim for unfair dismissal.
'The employment tribunal in respect of Ujima's dismissal of its former development director is highly critical of the association and is damaging to the reputation of the association and the social housing sector,' the letter said. The corporation was also concerned about the association's late submission of its accounts and the manner in which it communicated with the agency, the letter said. 'Ujima is... reluctant to recognise and accept our role as regulator and our legitimate interest in a number of areas.'
Ujima Housing Associations web Page is here and it's clear to see the racial bias within in it is just not tenant deep as can be seen by there soon to be unemployed team. But racial bias is OK rightAs a long-suffering tenant, I shall not shed a single tear over the demise of Ujima. This housing association's record has been and is atrocious. Ujima has been above criticism because it caters, in the main, for people from black and minority groups. Up until recently, the Housing Corporation had been far too lenient with this organisation, in a manner, I suspect that would not have been tolerated with a mainstream housing association. There may have been valid reasons for the existence of Ujima 30 years ago and I ask you to think of the social context of the mid 1970's when this association was formed: post-carnival riots in Notting Hill, poor employment prospects for young black Britons and an school system which still regarded Caribbeans as being educationally subnormal. Society has moved on for many of us (although judging by the contents of the Guardian's Society jobs section on Wednesday, perhaps not).
As a long-suffering neighbour of a Ujima multi-occ property their demise will not be mourned. We were always sympathetic to their BME objective, but a steady round of squatters and well-dodgy tenants made our lives very tough, and their case management was dire. Even the more stable and equally long-suffering Ujima tenants in the property didn't seem too happy, our wonderful West Indian neighbour, woman and three small children, was given a one-bedroom upstairs flat while the two-bedroom downstairs unit with the garden - ideal for playing etc. was allocated - between squats - to a rapidly cycling population of single young men who memorably responded to our first neighbourly greetng with the advice that we'd be wise to mind our own business (expletives deleted).
Board Members
Anthony AsemeMarta Phillips Yvette Mayers Leadership Team
Keith KerrCedric Boston Tony BuckleyTony BrownPrevin TailorNadine Ofori Atta Abena Nsia
Tuesday, January 01, 2008
Labour - Wasting More of Your Money
And even though they spent it in my gaff, the Bournemouth Nationalist did not get a penny....... bastards
Using Christmas as a cover, the government has admitted that security costs for their 2006 Bournemouth conference rose by a third last year, up £1,300,000 to £5,200,000. Then again, I suppose all Dorset Police's horses have to be fed. And then there's the cost of that so informative website.
Tony McNulty, the police minister, disclosed in a written answer to Tory MP David Ruffley that the Home Office grant to cover security at the conference rose from £3,984,000 in 2006 to £5,320,000 last year - an increase of more than a third. Over the same time period, the cost of policing the Conservative conference fell by 16 per cent, from £2,150,000 in 2006 to £1,797,000 in 2007.
Using Christmas as a cover, the government has admitted that security costs for their 2006 Bournemouth conference rose by a third last year, up £1,300,000 to £5,200,000. Then again, I suppose all Dorset Police's horses have to be fed. And then there's the cost of that so informative website.
Tony McNulty, the police minister, disclosed in a written answer to Tory MP David Ruffley that the Home Office grant to cover security at the conference rose from £3,984,000 in 2006 to £5,320,000 last year - an increase of more than a third. Over the same time period, the cost of policing the Conservative conference fell by 16 per cent, from £2,150,000 in 2006 to £1,797,000 in 2007.
Monday, December 31, 2007
Be Safe For New Years Eve
The new buzzword amongst British youth these days is making the rounds in varying contexts of the everyday environment. The word in question: “safe”, is commonly used to describe something that is stable, secure, structured; or any other ‘s’ related adjective that fittingly posits it in a similar frame of reference.
‘That’s safe’, ‘He’s safe’, ‘It’s going to be safe’ can all be encountered in any confrontation with today’s youth culture. The terms use itself does fittingly have the same connotations. To say one is ‘safe’ is to say they are a cool creature, not likely to be irritating or unruly. In this way the words usage is much the same in similarity to its traditional use: ‘it’s locked in a safe place’. Again, to say: ‘it’s going to be safe’, is supposed to appear a tempting prospect to those it concerns who may feel the topic in question is going to be boring or a waste of time. Those who should amply respond: “No way man, that’s going to be well unsafe”.
New speakers to the language may be particularly confused when encountering the term in this new colloquial realm. People are not referring to safe houses, or safety first, or safety in numbers, it is rather simply that they are using it is an alternative to the tired adjective ‘cool’.
Finally after sharing this knowledge I urge all my readers pro/anti BNP, rebel/Griffinite or neutral, men/wimmin, LGBT/Straight, Indigenous/ethnic, out there to be safe, not from mad cow disease, not from passive smoking, not from binge drinking, but rather to just be safe, be cool, be relaxed and be careful. Be Safe this New Years Eve.
P.S.
For the Information of my large local following I'll be at The Grange from about 9pm, see you there
P.P.S
Please note though that should any of my large local following decide to try it on with my daughter who is working behind the bar tonight your situation could rapidly become "well unsafe man" so best behaviour if you don't mind boys and girls
‘That’s safe’, ‘He’s safe’, ‘It’s going to be safe’ can all be encountered in any confrontation with today’s youth culture. The terms use itself does fittingly have the same connotations. To say one is ‘safe’ is to say they are a cool creature, not likely to be irritating or unruly. In this way the words usage is much the same in similarity to its traditional use: ‘it’s locked in a safe place’. Again, to say: ‘it’s going to be safe’, is supposed to appear a tempting prospect to those it concerns who may feel the topic in question is going to be boring or a waste of time. Those who should amply respond: “No way man, that’s going to be well unsafe”.
New speakers to the language may be particularly confused when encountering the term in this new colloquial realm. People are not referring to safe houses, or safety first, or safety in numbers, it is rather simply that they are using it is an alternative to the tired adjective ‘cool’.
Finally after sharing this knowledge I urge all my readers pro/anti BNP, rebel/Griffinite or neutral, men/wimmin, LGBT/Straight, Indigenous/ethnic, out there to be safe, not from mad cow disease, not from passive smoking, not from binge drinking, but rather to just be safe, be cool, be relaxed and be careful. Be Safe this New Years Eve.
P.S.
For the Information of my large local following I'll be at The Grange from about 9pm, see you there
P.P.S
Please note though that should any of my large local following decide to try it on with my daughter who is working behind the bar tonight your situation could rapidly become "well unsafe man" so best behaviour if you don't mind boys and girls
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Brown 10 - Cameron 3 - BNP Unimpressed
In the battle of the new year speeches Gordon Brown romped home with an emphatic victory using the word "change" 10 times against Cameron's paltry 3. It was an eagerly awaited battle as both teams this year had decided to ignore the major celebration of the year in which to address the nation and indeed this writer does wonder why, when 95% of the population were celebrating their Christian heritage on the 25th of this month, they were ignored by politicians across the spectrum whom seem so eager to make addresses at Eid and Diwali to name but two, could it be because Christians on the whole seem politically inactive.
Browns Speech For Britain, 2008 will be a year of real and serious changes.
Camerons Speech I sense that Britain feels it's time for a change.
After the the match a dejected Cameron claimed Brown had conned the ref in 7 of the changes, he said "Both him (Brown) and his predecessor have had 10 years of using the word change with the only change being a change for the worse and it was about time things changed" and if "vision" was used instead, he would have changed the result and trounced Brown 3 to 1". Cameron added that "the people wanted a man of vision and I am that visionary and with my vision for the future, changes would be a thing of the past, once we've changed things back to the way they were again of course, you see that's my vision. A Britain that works again and we can only do that by unbreaking everything that has been broken by change, surely you share my vision?"
Well I'm not so sure, so I made my excuses (I needed a change of shirt as I had vomitted on this one) and left to seek the victor.
On meeting the Champion I noted he was in a rather pugnacious mood, thumping his heavy duty fist into a Blairite, shouting "I told you that bastard public would fall for the old "change" routine again - like candy from a baby ha ha ha ha haaaaaa!" His duplicitous smile was suprisingly missing after having won such a momentous battle although with hindsight later on I realised that it was because there was not a camera crew in sight, having all been thrown onto the dole as they didn't have the required minority make up along with the fact that the only gay, lesbian, transgender camera crew in the country were in Brighton covering the towns colourful weekly shagfest and the n...black team were still in Trevor Phillip's office drooling over his bust of Lenin and they weren't expected to be done by at least March.
The Champs bottom lip seemed to continually hit the floor as he told me that Cameron was an amatuer, a lightweight pussy footing liberal and change was all he needed to floor him. Brown went on to say "Vision pah!! that's all the boy could offer" and "nobody could change with just vision." He added "not only did I beat him with change but in all the other departments I wiped the floor with this pipsqueek. Reform, I beat him 4 -3 on that. He couldn't handle the heat on terror, I beat him fair and square by 3 to 2, the boy is a born loser. And so much for Camorons green credentials I slaughtered him 3 nil on the climate stakes. But do you know what really marks me out as a master of spin....err speeches? Security, hey nobody noticed I used that word 6 yes that's right 6 times and how many did Davey baby get that in? (pause) Not once, not a single reference to security in his speech and that's what makes me so bloody good and so unbeatable, I'll take on anyone I am the God, the one, I am Allah" he finished as another clunking fist bore down on one of his unfortunate foot soldiers, Crud Arse or something like that was his name although I didn't get time to find out for sure as it was time to make a quick exit for another change, only this time it was for underpants.
For the nerds here are the stats;
Change: Brown 10 - Cameron 3
Vision: Brown 1 - Cameron 3
Reform: Brown 4 - Cameron 3
Terror: Brown 3 - Cameron 2
Climate: Brown 3 - Cameron 0
Security: Brown 6 - Cameron 0
Browns Speech For Britain, 2008 will be a year of real and serious changes.
Camerons Speech I sense that Britain feels it's time for a change.
After the the match a dejected Cameron claimed Brown had conned the ref in 7 of the changes, he said "Both him (Brown) and his predecessor have had 10 years of using the word change with the only change being a change for the worse and it was about time things changed" and if "vision" was used instead, he would have changed the result and trounced Brown 3 to 1". Cameron added that "the people wanted a man of vision and I am that visionary and with my vision for the future, changes would be a thing of the past, once we've changed things back to the way they were again of course, you see that's my vision. A Britain that works again and we can only do that by unbreaking everything that has been broken by change, surely you share my vision?"
Well I'm not so sure, so I made my excuses (I needed a change of shirt as I had vomitted on this one) and left to seek the victor.
On meeting the Champion I noted he was in a rather pugnacious mood, thumping his heavy duty fist into a Blairite, shouting "I told you that bastard public would fall for the old "change" routine again - like candy from a baby ha ha ha ha haaaaaa!" His duplicitous smile was suprisingly missing after having won such a momentous battle although with hindsight later on I realised that it was because there was not a camera crew in sight, having all been thrown onto the dole as they didn't have the required minority make up along with the fact that the only gay, lesbian, transgender camera crew in the country were in Brighton covering the towns colourful weekly shagfest and the n...black team were still in Trevor Phillip's office drooling over his bust of Lenin and they weren't expected to be done by at least March.
The Champs bottom lip seemed to continually hit the floor as he told me that Cameron was an amatuer, a lightweight pussy footing liberal and change was all he needed to floor him. Brown went on to say "Vision pah!! that's all the boy could offer" and "nobody could change with just vision." He added "not only did I beat him with change but in all the other departments I wiped the floor with this pipsqueek. Reform, I beat him 4 -3 on that. He couldn't handle the heat on terror, I beat him fair and square by 3 to 2, the boy is a born loser. And so much for Camorons green credentials I slaughtered him 3 nil on the climate stakes. But do you know what really marks me out as a master of spin....err speeches? Security, hey nobody noticed I used that word 6 yes that's right 6 times and how many did Davey baby get that in? (pause) Not once, not a single reference to security in his speech and that's what makes me so bloody good and so unbeatable, I'll take on anyone I am the God, the one, I am Allah" he finished as another clunking fist bore down on one of his unfortunate foot soldiers, Crud Arse or something like that was his name although I didn't get time to find out for sure as it was time to make a quick exit for another change, only this time it was for underpants.
For the nerds here are the stats;
Change: Brown 10 - Cameron 3
Vision: Brown 1 - Cameron 3
Reform: Brown 4 - Cameron 3
Terror: Brown 3 - Cameron 2
Climate: Brown 3 - Cameron 0
Security: Brown 6 - Cameron 0
Saturday, December 29, 2007
Bhutto - Flags at half Mast - In Britain
A corrupt pakistani politician dies and the morons in Bradford honour her.
Flags fly at half mast at Bradford Town Hall in West Yorkshire following the death of Pakistani politician Benazir Bhutto.
Only in dhimmi Britain would you expect to see such a scene. Whilst the untimely death of an ex-prime minister is a tragic event, it defies belief that a foreign ministers death commands that the Union Flag be flown at half mast. Then of course notice in the foreground the Pakistani flag flying on council property. Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this illegal, I thought only the Union Flag and the hated EU flag were the only ones that could be flown from council staff poles and only on appointed. Also I thought half mast was only for UK Royalty etc and needed an order from Buckingham Palace or No10.
It would be interesting to know whether any protocols have been breached flying the Pakistani flag. I can see no reason why it should be done within the remit of protocol, the only logical conclusion I can think of would be that the building and city as a whole has been taken over by foreign elements. Remind me again why British lives are being lost overseas, is it to ensure the British military don't kick off here as they see their homelands being colonised perhaps.
I look forward to seeing the Union Flag flying outside Islamabad governmental buildings when the leader of any ad hoc political party pops his clogs in the UK (Galloway and McBroon would be a good start).
On further reflection I'm just a bit shocked that the Union Flag is there at all. You would have thought the rage felt by the muslims in Bradford that the infidels flag was still flying would have had the dhimmi flying squad to charge down t' council and ordered the removal of such a racist image. Talk about double standards. If we make an exception for Bhutto, next time my granny's, hamster's second cousin dies, I'll bang in an application to fly the flag.
We bend over backwards to accommodate certain 'communities' (how I despise that term), but, and it pains me to say this, if you fly your own flag in your front garden, you're a racist - but only if your flag happens to be the union flag.
You make an exception, you actually create division. Bhutto had enemies in this country (certainly in Bradford) so flying the Pakistani National flag when she died, is in my eyes showing favouritism towards one group ie Bhutto supporters. And we can't show favouritism in Broon's multi cultural Britain can we? Sounds like the Bradford labour council want it all ways. Why couldn't thay have saved all the bother of potentialy offending 99% of the population, breaking the law and instead set up a condolence book for people to sign?
Ok, so is it legal? - Well apparently not, so says HM The Queen
So flags on Government buildings are only flown on Royal Command, firstly there has to be official mourning in the nation of the deceased (Pakistan) which it has not declared and as Pakistan is also suspended from the commonwealth the flag should not be flown at all.
New Labour dhimmis to a man and as usual breaking the law yet again.
Flags fly at half mast at Bradford Town Hall in West Yorkshire following the death of Pakistani politician Benazir Bhutto.
Only in dhimmi Britain would you expect to see such a scene. Whilst the untimely death of an ex-prime minister is a tragic event, it defies belief that a foreign ministers death commands that the Union Flag be flown at half mast. Then of course notice in the foreground the Pakistani flag flying on council property. Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't this illegal, I thought only the Union Flag and the hated EU flag were the only ones that could be flown from council staff poles and only on appointed. Also I thought half mast was only for UK Royalty etc and needed an order from Buckingham Palace or No10.
It would be interesting to know whether any protocols have been breached flying the Pakistani flag. I can see no reason why it should be done within the remit of protocol, the only logical conclusion I can think of would be that the building and city as a whole has been taken over by foreign elements. Remind me again why British lives are being lost overseas, is it to ensure the British military don't kick off here as they see their homelands being colonised perhaps.
I look forward to seeing the Union Flag flying outside Islamabad governmental buildings when the leader of any ad hoc political party pops his clogs in the UK (Galloway and McBroon would be a good start).
On further reflection I'm just a bit shocked that the Union Flag is there at all. You would have thought the rage felt by the muslims in Bradford that the infidels flag was still flying would have had the dhimmi flying squad to charge down t' council and ordered the removal of such a racist image. Talk about double standards. If we make an exception for Bhutto, next time my granny's, hamster's second cousin dies, I'll bang in an application to fly the flag.
We bend over backwards to accommodate certain 'communities' (how I despise that term), but, and it pains me to say this, if you fly your own flag in your front garden, you're a racist - but only if your flag happens to be the union flag.
You make an exception, you actually create division. Bhutto had enemies in this country (certainly in Bradford) so flying the Pakistani National flag when she died, is in my eyes showing favouritism towards one group ie Bhutto supporters. And we can't show favouritism in Broon's multi cultural Britain can we? Sounds like the Bradford labour council want it all ways. Why couldn't thay have saved all the bother of potentialy offending 99% of the population, breaking the law and instead set up a condolence book for people to sign?
Ok, so is it legal? - Well apparently not, so says HM The Queen
Flags on government buildings Q. Do I need planning
permission?
A. Under Schedule 1 Class H of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007, national flags, the flags of the Commonwealth, European Union, the United Nations, English counties and certain saints can be flown without the express consent of local authorities as long as they satisfy the standard conditions for the display of advertisements generally and the conditions and limitations set out within Class H itself.
Q. What is half mast?
A. Half-mast means the flag is flown two-thirds of the way up the flagpole with at least the height of the flag between the top of the flag and the top of the flagpole.
If more than one flag is flown they should all be raised at half-mast or not flown at all.
Flags of foreign nations should not be flown unless their country is also observing mourning.
So flags on Government buildings are only flown on Royal Command, firstly there has to be official mourning in the nation of the deceased (Pakistan) which it has not declared and as Pakistan is also suspended from the commonwealth the flag should not be flown at all.
New Labour dhimmis to a man and as usual breaking the law yet again.
Thursday, December 27, 2007
AL Qaeda, Gordon Brown - Peas in a Pod
Check out this statement from Gordon Clown over the murder of ex Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. Note the moment when he calls those who committed this act as cowards of democracy.
Well I nearly swallowed my foot when he said that. Electoral cowardice he spouts. Yet this is the same man who has in the past few months backed down from holding a general election, and reneged on Labour's manifesto commitment to hold a referendum on the EU constitution, has also backed down in a row over school budgets and instructed his Home Secretary to renege on paying the police a paltry 2.5% increase yet demand a whopping 10% pay rise for themselves. Yes, it's that man Gordon Clown, middle name Electoral Cowardice.
Well I nearly swallowed my foot when he said that. Electoral cowardice he spouts. Yet this is the same man who has in the past few months backed down from holding a general election, and reneged on Labour's manifesto commitment to hold a referendum on the EU constitution, has also backed down in a row over school budgets and instructed his Home Secretary to renege on paying the police a paltry 2.5% increase yet demand a whopping 10% pay rise for themselves. Yes, it's that man Gordon Clown, middle name Electoral Cowardice.
Criminals Dont Kill Police Officers, Chief Constables Do
Macho fitness tests 'hold women police back'
Women fail to get into specialist police squads because the fitness tests are geared towards men, a leading female officer claims. Julie Spence, Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire, said women were being barred from promotion into teams like the firearms unit and mounted section because they cannot pass outdated assessments of upper body strength. Continued.
So apparently this (female) chief constable of Cambridgeshire thinks that certain tests for gaining entry into certain specialist police units are unfair to women and "outdated". In the mind of this demented feminist ,Women are treated unfairly as they cant compete with men in upper body strength and fitness. She thinks that as women can shoot straight and think tactically they shouldn't have to worry about fitness or strength. Of course forgetting that physical strength is the key demand in the majority of police work especially when one considers all the parafinalia that a copper has to carry in order to perform his or her daily duties.
How about these scenarios ? you demented bint...............................
I'm in a building as part of a two man entry team we come under overwhelming fire and need to retreat, I'm a large male and I'm with a woman who is five feet two , how is she going to pull me out if I'm shot?
We meet an unarmed but violent mentally ill opponent who is intent on suicide by cop , who is going to over power him , me or the little woman?
This is the same daft woman who ordered £500,000 worth of nice cars for herself and her senior colleagues and then had the order(rightly) cancelled by the local authority.
And if not to top it off we hear today of a copper who tragically died of a heart attack whilst trying to arrest/defuse a violent domestic.
And those wankers in parliament and the home office want to fuck PC Plod over for the sake of £30 million? Whilst at the same time bailing out Northern Rock to the tune of 50 billion pounds (£1,800 per taxpayer) of which most of it will be creamed off by the money men in the financial markets AND on top of that handing over another 3 billion pounds of taxpayers money to the world bank on the pretence of saving the third world when all it will do is line the pockets of every tin pot dictator in those cesspits of humanity.
Lions led by donkeys doesn't even come close. This Government and its PC hangers on are a sick joke and come the day they will be thrown out of office and strung up to the nearest lamp post will be the day for street parties as this country finds its freedom again.
Women fail to get into specialist police squads because the fitness tests are geared towards men, a leading female officer claims. Julie Spence, Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire, said women were being barred from promotion into teams like the firearms unit and mounted section because they cannot pass outdated assessments of upper body strength. Continued.
So apparently this (female) chief constable of Cambridgeshire thinks that certain tests for gaining entry into certain specialist police units are unfair to women and "outdated". In the mind of this demented feminist ,Women are treated unfairly as they cant compete with men in upper body strength and fitness. She thinks that as women can shoot straight and think tactically they shouldn't have to worry about fitness or strength. Of course forgetting that physical strength is the key demand in the majority of police work especially when one considers all the parafinalia that a copper has to carry in order to perform his or her daily duties.
How about these scenarios ? you demented bint...............................
I'm in a building as part of a two man entry team we come under overwhelming fire and need to retreat, I'm a large male and I'm with a woman who is five feet two , how is she going to pull me out if I'm shot?
We meet an unarmed but violent mentally ill opponent who is intent on suicide by cop , who is going to over power him , me or the little woman?
This is the same daft woman who ordered £500,000 worth of nice cars for herself and her senior colleagues and then had the order(rightly) cancelled by the local authority.
And if not to top it off we hear today of a copper who tragically died of a heart attack whilst trying to arrest/defuse a violent domestic.
In other words if Chief Constable Julie Spence had her way, more less fit, less able and no doubt smaller men and women would be able to qualify as coppers and so more of the fragile examples of law enforcement in Britain are likely to suffer more serious injuries and more deaths in our ever increasingly violent society.Police constable Chris Roberts, 48, collapsed outside a house in Wembley as
officers arrested a man during a violent struggle, it was revealed today.
Colleagues and paramedics tried to resuscitate him for 45 minutes as he lay
dying. A 34-year-old man was later arrested on suspicion of murder. A
post-mortem examination found Pc Roberts died of natural causes, Scotland Yard
said. Tests carried out at Northwick Park Hospital in north-west
London today revealed the cause of his death was heart disease.
And those wankers in parliament and the home office want to fuck PC Plod over for the sake of £30 million? Whilst at the same time bailing out Northern Rock to the tune of 50 billion pounds (£1,800 per taxpayer) of which most of it will be creamed off by the money men in the financial markets AND on top of that handing over another 3 billion pounds of taxpayers money to the world bank on the pretence of saving the third world when all it will do is line the pockets of every tin pot dictator in those cesspits of humanity.
Lions led by donkeys doesn't even come close. This Government and its PC hangers on are a sick joke and come the day they will be thrown out of office and strung up to the nearest lamp post will be the day for street parties as this country finds its freedom again.
Monday, December 24, 2007
Out of the Frying Pan Into the Pyre
Britons want the Tories - We're all Doomed
From the Mail;
Voters today delivered a damning verdict on Gordon Brown's first six months as Prime Minister in a poll showing widespread public appetite for a change of government. A survey for the Independent shows most people think David Cameron would be the best leader of the country and that he has the most able frontbench team. According to the ComRes poll, 48 per cent of voters agree with the statement: "It's time for a change and the next government should be a Conservative one."
I am surprised that only half of voters questioned want a change of this treasonous, anti British, marxist Government. The problem also is that voting Conservative will only change the colour of government not the effect, which I realised many years ago, hence my ripping up of the Tory membership card and my new allegience to the only patriotic party that will stand up for the rights of every indigenous and civil British citizen.
If the Tories did get in, things that voters hope would change, simply wouldn't as there is nothing the EU appeasing blue party could do without leaving said communist blok!
We will still be fighting the poor Iraqis, Cameron has stated that he wants to invade IRAN !!
Britain will still be in the European Soviet.
Britain will still have no control over its own borders,
Britain will still pay £120,000 per minute into Europe whilst our Pensioners decide whether to buy food or Community Charges.
Our Children will continue to have their Grammar Schools closed.
The conservatives will not even be able to have our bins emptied every week... as they bow to the European waste management laws.
48% want change...49% with me...but the Conservatives are unable to effect any change. Cameron, the upper class moron will be little better than the old wobble gob Jock McBroon and his marxist cronies. The only way to solve the massive problems we face is to take back the power that has been given to Europe and the "Yuman Rights" cretins. Britian needs a government who has the benefit of the British People first and foremost, and that change should be in the remit of conservatives, but is not because it to has been infested by marxist loving liberal scum, so the only alternative is the British National Party..
I also think that 48% of people wanting a change of government is a tad on the conservative side, all you need to do is look at blogs and the comments on the major news sites to see how angry people are becoming. Nu Labour have proved beyond doubt to be the cancer of our time, and need cutting out before Britain is turned in to the most violent hell hole seen in modern times. Ordinary tax paying people have immense resentment for Nu Labour and I can see that large-scale civil unrest is only just around the next corner if Gordon Brown and his ministers maintain their contempt for the Brit.
Never before in the history of British politics have so few managed to enrage so many.
A change back to a Government FOR Britain ? Then it's the BNP for you.
P.S.
To my faithful reader, a merry Christmas and a prosperous new year to you. See you in 2008 for more rants and random news items to amuse and annoy you.
From the Mail;
Voters today delivered a damning verdict on Gordon Brown's first six months as Prime Minister in a poll showing widespread public appetite for a change of government. A survey for the Independent shows most people think David Cameron would be the best leader of the country and that he has the most able frontbench team. According to the ComRes poll, 48 per cent of voters agree with the statement: "It's time for a change and the next government should be a Conservative one."
I am surprised that only half of voters questioned want a change of this treasonous, anti British, marxist Government. The problem also is that voting Conservative will only change the colour of government not the effect, which I realised many years ago, hence my ripping up of the Tory membership card and my new allegience to the only patriotic party that will stand up for the rights of every indigenous and civil British citizen.
If the Tories did get in, things that voters hope would change, simply wouldn't as there is nothing the EU appeasing blue party could do without leaving said communist blok!
We will still be fighting the poor Iraqis, Cameron has stated that he wants to invade IRAN !!
Britain will still be in the European Soviet.
Britain will still have no control over its own borders,
Britain will still pay £120,000 per minute into Europe whilst our Pensioners decide whether to buy food or Community Charges.
Our Children will continue to have their Grammar Schools closed.
The conservatives will not even be able to have our bins emptied every week... as they bow to the European waste management laws.
48% want change...49% with me...but the Conservatives are unable to effect any change. Cameron, the upper class moron will be little better than the old wobble gob Jock McBroon and his marxist cronies. The only way to solve the massive problems we face is to take back the power that has been given to Europe and the "Yuman Rights" cretins. Britian needs a government who has the benefit of the British People first and foremost, and that change should be in the remit of conservatives, but is not because it to has been infested by marxist loving liberal scum, so the only alternative is the British National Party..
I also think that 48% of people wanting a change of government is a tad on the conservative side, all you need to do is look at blogs and the comments on the major news sites to see how angry people are becoming. Nu Labour have proved beyond doubt to be the cancer of our time, and need cutting out before Britain is turned in to the most violent hell hole seen in modern times. Ordinary tax paying people have immense resentment for Nu Labour and I can see that large-scale civil unrest is only just around the next corner if Gordon Brown and his ministers maintain their contempt for the Brit.
Never before in the history of British politics have so few managed to enrage so many.
A change back to a Government FOR Britain ? Then it's the BNP for you.
P.S.
To my faithful reader, a merry Christmas and a prosperous new year to you. See you in 2008 for more rants and random news items to amuse and annoy you.
Thursday, December 20, 2007
The BNP Spat Falls Flat
By now most of you will be aware that over the last week or so the BNP has had some serious internal problems. As an obviously interested observer I have been keeping a close watch on developments and trying to decipher fact from fiction, truth from lie and claim against counter claim a feat just as difficult for instance as single handedly fitting a duvet cover over a king size quilt or trying to knit fog or teaching the parents how the new DVD player works.
So whats been happening ? On the face of it a couple of prominent activists/employees were caught in an amateurish attempt to pressure the Chairman into getting rid of two colleagues in the leadership of the party.
One of those caught out is a bit of a 'pin up' girl among nationalists and the two who they wanted removed are to say the least a bit unpopular, one it is claimed is useless at his job and the other claimed to be "nazi and proud" some years back but that is not really the point in the greater scheme of things as they pan out. Lets look a bit deeper and put a few questions to what has become a small but noisy " rebel faction ".
Why when the BNP chairman demoted one of the members in question and removed the position of the other in a reshuffle, something that should have been seen as an olive branch and an attempt to meet you halfway without alienating the loyal majority or undermining his position did you change the goal posts and add more demands ?
How did you manage to print and distribute the fake “British Nationalist Bulletin” in such a short time who financed it ? Apart from the probable illegal use of membership data it all seems a bit pre-planned.
Why, when the "Voting Member structure" is slowly bringing internal democracy into the party when before apart from the choice of leader there was none, are you making an issue of this ? It was your chairman who wanted internal democracy in the first place . Again why now when the BNP has gained enough momentum to start winning seats on a new level (London and the Euro's) chose to upset the apple cart in such a cack-handed way surely there were better options to get what you claim to want.
Now the most awkward question of all and think very deeply about it before overreacting and shouting it's a smear. WHO'S THE MOLE, who's working for Searchlight the state or both, that was just as awkward to ask for us here at Covert mansion because we know many of the " rebel faction " are amongst the most hard working dedicated nationalists there are but everything points to an inside man.
Searchlight seem to have done the ground work for this trouble with their leaflet sent out two months ago to known activists and candidates from the last local elections their information was good , too good infact . The false flag nationalist blogs have been dropping hints for months about this they were probably fed tit bits by their Searchlight controllers to pave the way for the trouble.
I might be wrong after all I'm on the outside looking in, you never know Gerry Gable might have crystal balls but on the balance of probabilities there's an informant/provocateur at work . So who is it ? For 99% of the " rebel faction " who are not informants or provocateurs who think they are making a stand on principle ask yourselves if any of this is worth slowing the progress the only really successful nationalist party this nation has ever had are there far better ways forward.
I have nothing against anyone on either side of this latest farce and to be honest everyone needs to stop thinking about themselves and concentrate on the people who REALLY gave them their positions of power, the REAL people, the people out there who voted to make a difference, the average man and woman on the street. The only people losing out over all this is them while everyone else is too busy being dramatic. The majority of which are also insulting those who have been on the real front line, all those in the 70's 80's and 90's who paved the way for them years before most of them had a clue who are not interested in getting involved in this embarresment. All those organisers who have voiced a concern but carried on with work as usual (after all don't go forgetting those people whos votes are important and want to make a difference) keep up the good work. Well done to all the other nationalist organisations who also decided to avoid this circus because its so fucking embarrassing.
It would be nice to think that the previously hard working nationalist's/rebels would realise the error of their ways and come back to the fold with their tales between their legs and follow the legal procedures to air their greivences but I fear that they have all taken this too far and at least one, if not all are paid informants to anti BNP organisations and if the latest news of their actions are true then it would be impossible to have them back as they would have committed acts of gross misconduct affording and nesessitating instant dismissal if not criminal prosecution. If you are a nationalist currently siding with the rebels this is the article you should read, it should provide you with the required ointment to dispense the rash with.
So whats been happening ? On the face of it a couple of prominent activists/employees were caught in an amateurish attempt to pressure the Chairman into getting rid of two colleagues in the leadership of the party.
One of those caught out is a bit of a 'pin up' girl among nationalists and the two who they wanted removed are to say the least a bit unpopular, one it is claimed is useless at his job and the other claimed to be "nazi and proud" some years back but that is not really the point in the greater scheme of things as they pan out. Lets look a bit deeper and put a few questions to what has become a small but noisy " rebel faction ".
Why when the BNP chairman demoted one of the members in question and removed the position of the other in a reshuffle, something that should have been seen as an olive branch and an attempt to meet you halfway without alienating the loyal majority or undermining his position did you change the goal posts and add more demands ?
How did you manage to print and distribute the fake “British Nationalist Bulletin” in such a short time who financed it ? Apart from the probable illegal use of membership data it all seems a bit pre-planned.
Why, when the "Voting Member structure" is slowly bringing internal democracy into the party when before apart from the choice of leader there was none, are you making an issue of this ? It was your chairman who wanted internal democracy in the first place . Again why now when the BNP has gained enough momentum to start winning seats on a new level (London and the Euro's) chose to upset the apple cart in such a cack-handed way surely there were better options to get what you claim to want.
Now the most awkward question of all and think very deeply about it before overreacting and shouting it's a smear. WHO'S THE MOLE, who's working for Searchlight the state or both, that was just as awkward to ask for us here at Covert mansion because we know many of the " rebel faction " are amongst the most hard working dedicated nationalists there are but everything points to an inside man.
Searchlight seem to have done the ground work for this trouble with their leaflet sent out two months ago to known activists and candidates from the last local elections their information was good , too good infact . The false flag nationalist blogs have been dropping hints for months about this they were probably fed tit bits by their Searchlight controllers to pave the way for the trouble.
I might be wrong after all I'm on the outside looking in, you never know Gerry Gable might have crystal balls but on the balance of probabilities there's an informant/provocateur at work . So who is it ? For 99% of the " rebel faction " who are not informants or provocateurs who think they are making a stand on principle ask yourselves if any of this is worth slowing the progress the only really successful nationalist party this nation has ever had are there far better ways forward.
I have nothing against anyone on either side of this latest farce and to be honest everyone needs to stop thinking about themselves and concentrate on the people who REALLY gave them their positions of power, the REAL people, the people out there who voted to make a difference, the average man and woman on the street. The only people losing out over all this is them while everyone else is too busy being dramatic. The majority of which are also insulting those who have been on the real front line, all those in the 70's 80's and 90's who paved the way for them years before most of them had a clue who are not interested in getting involved in this embarresment. All those organisers who have voiced a concern but carried on with work as usual (after all don't go forgetting those people whos votes are important and want to make a difference) keep up the good work. Well done to all the other nationalist organisations who also decided to avoid this circus because its so fucking embarrassing.
It would be nice to think that the previously hard working nationalist's/rebels would realise the error of their ways and come back to the fold with their tales between their legs and follow the legal procedures to air their greivences but I fear that they have all taken this too far and at least one, if not all are paid informants to anti BNP organisations and if the latest news of their actions are true then it would be impossible to have them back as they would have committed acts of gross misconduct affording and nesessitating instant dismissal if not criminal prosecution. If you are a nationalist currently siding with the rebels this is the article you should read, it should provide you with the required ointment to dispense the rash with.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
